Pluckley
Pluckley is reputedly
the country’s most haunted village. A station was opened 1¼-miles south of here
on the extension of South Eastern Railway (SER) services from Headcorn to Ashford on 1st December 1842. Along the earliest sections of route opened
by the SER, many of the rural intermediate affairs had little in the form of
station infrastructure from the outset. Indeed, it is true that at several
‘’station’’ sites, the company merely provided wooden planks, these bridging the
gap between ground level and the floor of railway carriages. It is probable
that, initially, this was the situation which presented itself at Pluckley.
However, a layout recognisable as a station would have come into use not long
after through running commenced to Dover, in February 1844. The arrangement
established here was typically SER, with a pair of staggered platform faces
residing either side of a double-track. The ‘’up’’ and ‘’down’’ platforms’
longitudinal positions were west and east of each other respectively, and it was
the latter which became host to the 70-foot long main building. This was an
economical single-storey timber affair, constituted of horizontally-aligned
tongue-and-groove planks (as per that SER structure still in existence at Northfleet), and demonstrated a slated pitched-roof. No less than three chimney
stacks formed part of this building: two emerged through the roof, whilst a
third was attached to the structure’s eastern elevation. Three sets of
double-doors were in evidence on the platform-facing façade, and these were
matched in number by the casement-style window frames. Emerging from the western elevation was
a small appendix of marginally reduced height. Naturally, a track-foot crossing
existed between the two platform surfaces.
Goods facilities were expanded over time. Within thirty-five years of opening, a
single eastward-facing siding had emerged on the ‘’up’’ side, residing at about
seven degrees to the running lines. Furthermore, a westward-facing dock line was
also in evidence on the ‘’down’’ line, terminating beside the western extremity
of the platform. The latter was accompanied by a trio of south-westward-facing tracks,
which skewed away from the running lines – the northern most of these sidings
terminated within a goods shed (the layout developments are later illustrated in
diagram form). All goods yard tracks on this side, including the dock line,
could only be accessed by means of a reversal manoeuvre via a headshunt.
Finally, at the eastern end of the ''down'' platform existed a westward-facing
siding, which had a facing connection with the ''down'' running line and
served a line of coal stacks. At this time, individual sets of points were operated by
immediately adjacent levers, but nevertheless, a diminutive signal cabin was
still erected. This was a single-storey timber-built pitched-roof affair,
residing at the eastern end of the ‘’up’’ platform. It seems unlikely that this
structure contained any form of lever frame, and rather, it would appear that it
merely provided sheltered accommodation for the signalman, whom would operate
the adjacent semaphore signal and point levers by hand.
In about 1885, the SER significantly altered the layout here; this included the
rebuilding of the ‘’down’’ side main building. All four existing timber
elevations of the structure were removed and subsequently replaced by sides
of clapboard construction, set upon a shallow brick base. These differed from
the previous tongue-and-groove fabrications by having horizontally-aligned
planks of overlapping formation. In conjunction with these works, it would
appear that the structure was both lengthened and widened, thus producing a
virtually new building. A
diminutive canopy, identical in design to that still in existence at East
Farleigh, emerged on the building’s approach road-facing façade. The original
structure’s aforementioned western appendix was lengthened sideways, and its
flat-roof was replaced by a slanting one. Interestingly, the platform-facing
façade of the appendix continued to demonstrate tongue-and groove timber,
suggesting that wood from the original main building was reused in its
extension. However, the side and rear walls of this particular section were of
clapboard construction. Further to these modifications, both platform surfaces
were rebuilt to a higher profile, and the ‘’up’’ surface received an attractive
timber waiting shelter, of about 20-foot in length with an upward-sloping
roof – it is likely that this was constituted of recycled wood from the original
''down'' building. The ''down'' coal siding was relayed, so now it was eastward-facing and
terminated behind the platform. In addition to
this, a 540-yard-long eastward-facing siding was installed beside the ‘’down’’
running line, immediately west of the road bridge. The presence of the latter
prevented this line joining up with the existing goods yard.
Also of importance is the connection made with the 1877-opened ''Pluckley Brick & Tile Works'': this, too, fed off the aforementioned ‘’down’’ siding as a
single-track, heading off in a north-westerly direction to meet the kilns of the
complex.
22nd June 2007
A Class 375 with a name is observed at Pluckley, forming a Victoria to Ashford service: No. 375830
''City of London''. The metal lamp posts in evidence are of 1990s origin. David Glasspool
A second eastward view includes the 1961 prefabricated concrete footbridge, the clapboard station
building, and the later ''down'' side concrete platform extension. The timber fencing on both platforms
has been a feature of the station since the earliest years. David Glasspool
The clapboard structure in evidence on the ''down'' platform today is of about 1885 origin, the
original timber building having been replaced during station enlargement works. Of note are
the SER's trademark sash-style windows and the distinct lack of the building's western appendix.
Also in view is the solid concrete platform surface of the Southern Railway; the distinct hole in
the platform once accommodated mechanical signalling equipment for the opposite ''up'' track's
set of points. David Glasspool
Next: The History Continues >>
Return to the Kent Rail Homepage or alternatively, check for Updates.
Website & Copyright information - Links - Contact the Webmaster
All content is copyright © David Glasspool